The conservative right have one argument I just giggle at. I have to wonder why they picked ducks. Why couldn’t they have picked billy goats or chimpanzees? What’s so spectacular about ducks?
Bill O’Reilly has started that if gay marriage is allowed, next people will want to marry ducks. This is a common “slippery slope” argument. It isn’t accurate though since ducks cannot consent to being married to humans and the whole purpose of legalizing gay marriage is to allow two, adult, consenting same sex partners to marry.
Well, Pat Robertson had to talk about ducks, too. He doesn’t like the fact that a bill is on the table that would protect sexual orientation under the status of hate crime. If we protect the “gays” what’s next? Should we protect the guy who wants to have sex with a duck? Should that guy be protected under the status of hate crime?!
Seriously, Pat. Are you that stupid? How can you compare duck love to same-sex love? That’s just silly.
Apparently, two pro-gay marriage actresses agree. They’ve come up with a video response/parody. It’s quite funny.
Sex with Ducks is the brainchild of Riki “Garfunkel” Lindhome and Kate “Oates” Micucci. I think it’s hilarious. How about you?[tags]Sex with Ducks, Gay Marriage, Slippery Slope, Riki “Garfunkel” Lindhome, Kate “Oates” Micucci, Video, Funny, Pat Robertson, Bill O’Reilly[/tags]